Antimicrobial
Property of Herbal Toothpastes: An In-Vitro Analysis.
Manupati Prasanth1* and Satya Narayana Ratha2
1School
of Microbiology, Mahatma Gandhi National Institute of Research and Social Action
(M.G.N.I.R.S.A), Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
2Alluri Seetharama Raju Centre for Tribal Studies, Mahatma Gandhi National Institute of Research and Social Action (M.G.N.I.R.S.A), Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: prasanthmanupati@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Oral care is an important
component of personal hygiene. Meticulous plaque control, on a daily basis with
toothbrush, is the most important step to achieve good oral health. Available
dental-care measures have not been inadequate to deal with this problem. Consequently, incorporation of
herbal extracts in the formulation of toothpastes is becoming a popular mode of
plaque control. On the backdrop of this
scenario, the present study is designed to evaluate antimicrobial properties
and effect of six toothpastes claiming herbal ingradiants by using agar well diffusion method and to
determine their suitability for
regular usage. Six herbal
dentifrices are tested for their anti-microbial activity against three oral
pathogens, namely, Streptococcus mutans (MTCC 890), Lactobacillus acidophilus (MTCC *447) and Candida albicans
(MTCC 854) by well agar diffusion assay. Anti-caries evaluation shows that
herbal based dentifrice formulation A displayed the maximum zones of
inhibition against all the organisms tested (p<0.05) as compared to all other dentifrice formulations. Hence, dentifrice formulation A has
significant antimicrobial activity; and thus can be employed as an effective
anti-plaque agent in the prevention of dental caries. The findings from this
study may be of use to dental professionals.
KEYWORDS: Anti-microbial activity, Dental caries,
Herbal based dentifrices, Zone
of inhibition, Well agar diffusion
assay
INTRODUCTION:
Oral health is central to our general well-being
and quality of life, which connote healthy teeth, absence of oral-facial pain
and oral soft-tissue lesions, etc. One cannot be entirely healthy without good
oral health. Despite great amelioration in the management of global oral
hygiene over the past several decades, problems still persist. Dental caries
and diseases of the periodontium are among the most
common afflictions of the humankind.
Dental caries (tooth decay) is an infection
of the calcified tissues of the teeth, caused primarily by Streptococcus mutans 1.Other
microorganisms, like Lactobacillus
acidophilus and Candida albicans act as catalysts. According to the World
Health Organization (W.H.O), 60-90% of school children, worldwide, have dental
cavities 2. However, a marked decline in the pervasiveness of caries
has been observed in developed countries. On the other hand, it is on the rise
in developing countries3.
Diseases affecting the periodontal
structures beyond the gingiva and leading to loss of
connective tissue attachment are called periodontal diseases. Periodontal
diseases are among the most prevalent diseases in mankind, afflicting about 30%
of the adult population4. The prevalence and severity of periodontal
diseases have been found to increase with age and is more common in males than
females5. Majority of adults exhibit some degree of periodontal
disease. Streptococci, Spirochetes and bacteroids are the pathogens responsible for the ailment.
Daily plaque removal with
a toothbrush is an important component of most oral hygiene programs intended
to prevent and treat plaque mediated diseases, dental caries and periodontal diseases. As
all are not likely to follow the optimal oral hygiene regimen, synthetic
chemotherapeutic agents appear as beneficial alternatives6.
Consequently, despite being beneficial to some extent, entry of these synthetic
chemical agents into the mouth have resulted in undesirable side effects7.
Hence, the search for alternative products continues and plants (herbs) and
naturally derived products (herbal supplements) isolated from plants used in
traditional medicine are considered as good alternatives to synthetic
chemicals.
Plants have been looked upon as important
resource bases to combat serious diseases, from time immemorial. According to
WHO (1993), 80% of the world’s population is dependent on the traditional
medicine, and a major part of the traditional therapies involves the use of
plant extracts or their active constituents8. Yet, a scientific
study of plants, to determine their antimicrobial active components, is a
comparatively new field. Development in alternative medicine research has led
to many efficient mouthrinses and toothpastes based
on plant extracts9. The scientific evidence supports the efficacy
and safety of numerous herbs10.
Therefore, the aim of this study is to see the efficacy of the selected six
herbal dentifrices, against specific plaque mediated microorganisms by using
agar well diffusion method.
Test microorganisms:
Pure cultures of Streptococcus mutans
(MTCC 890), Lactobacillus acidophilus (MTCC *447) and Candida albicans (MTCC 854) were procured from Institute of
Microbial Technology, Chandigarh, India. These were cultured on the
specific media, procured from Himedia Laboratory Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India, recommended for
different microorganisms such as Brain heart infusion agar (S. mutans), Lactobacillus MRS agar (L.acidophilus), Nutrient agar (C.
albicans) and incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24 h while Candida albicans was incubated for 48 h.
Assortment
of dentifrices:
Six different brands of herbal
dentifrices, were randomly selected and procured from the local market. The
particulars of the ingredients in each dentifrice formulation, as mentioned by
the manufacturers, are noted (Table 1). The selected herbal dentifrice
solutions were made by
mixing the calculated amount
of the dentifrices (2.0 gm)
in a measured volume (2.0 ml) of
the sterile pyrogen-free distilled water, to give 1:1
dilution. They were further diluted in sterile pyrogen-free
distilled water and three different dilutions of 1:2, 1:4 and 1:8 were made. Nutrient agar, lactobacillus MRS agar and brain heart
infusion agar plates were
prepared to assess the antimicrobial activity of six herbal dentifrices against the pathogens. All other chemicals and reagents used are of
analytical grade.
Antimicrobial assay:
The antimicrobial activity of each
herbal dentifrice formulation is determined, using a modified agar well
diffusion method11. Growth from freshly subcultured
isolates are suspended in 10 mL of sterile saline to
obtain a turbidity of 0.5 McFarland standards. Nutrient agar, lactobacillus MRS agar and brain heart infusion agar plates were
prepared and seeded with 0.5 mL of suspended cultures
of each isolate (Nutrient agar was used for C. albicans, lactobacillus MRS agar for L.acidophilus,
where as brain heart infusion agar was used for Streptococcus mutans strain). Then wells of 8 mm diameter, are punched
into the plate surface with equal distance from each other. Each well was then filled with 0.2mL diluted dentifrice
solutions, while the same amount of sterile distilled water was also added as a
control. The plates are then incubated at 37°C for 24 h (48 h for yeast
species). The antimicrobial activity is
evaluated by measuring the diameter of zones of inhibition in mm (Figure 1).
All the plates are made in triplicate, and the experiments repeated three
times.
Table 1: Ingredients of various herbal dentifrices tested for
antimicrobial potential.
Dentifrices |
|
A |
Dried Ginger 1.5mg, Black Pepper 1.5mg, Long Pepper 1.5mg, Harra 1.0mg, Amla
1.0mg, Liquirice 1.0mg, Karpoor
3.0mg, Clove 2.5mg. |
B |
Dadima (Punica granatum) 2.57mg,Tumburu (Zanthoxylum alatum)
1.80mg, Babbula (Acacia arabica) 1.71mg, Triphala 1.71mg, Vidanga (Embelia ribes) 1.71mg, Nirgundi (Vitex negundo) 1.14mg, Vaikranta bhasma 2mg, Nimba (Azadirachta indica) 1.44mg, Ajamoda satva 1mg, Sodium
Benzoate IP, Bronopol IP, Saccharin Sodium IP 0.5%. |
C |
Dicalcium Phosphate Dihydrate,
Sorbitol, Deionised
Water, Sodium Lauryl Sulphate,
Ganoderma Lucidum
(Mushroom) Stem Extract, Propylene Glycol, Silica, Menta
Piperita (Peppermint) Flavour,
Chondrus Crispus (Carrageenan) Extract, Cellulose Gum, Sodium Benzoate,
Sodium Saccharin, Menthol. |
D |
Herbal extracts 2.5% w/w (Maricha / Marica
(Piper nigrum) 31.04g, Pippali
(Piper longum) 31.04g, Shunthi
(Zingiber officinale)
31.04g, Tejovati / Tomar
(Zanthoxylum armatum)
31.04g)., Lavang / Laung
oil (Syzygium aromaticum)
0.50g, Karpoor (Cinnamomum
camphora) 0.50g, Pudina satva (Mentha spicata) 0.50g, Gairic Powder
1.80g, Sweetener (Sodium saccharin), Preservatives (Methyl paraben, Propyl paraben, Sodium benzoate), Excipient
q.s. |
E |
Calcium Carbonate, Sorbitol, Silica, Sodium Lauryl Sulfate, Polyethylene Glycol, Flavor, Sodium Carboxy Methyl Cellulose, Sodium Silicate, Sodium Monofluorophosphate, Sodium Saccharin, Xanthan Gum, Pigment Green No. 7 (Cl
74260), Myrrh Tincture, Chamomile Tincture, Tea Tree Oil, Sage Oil,
Eucalyptus, in aqueous base. |
F |
Cardamom Extract 0.50%, Ginger Extract 0.50%, Cinnamon Extract
0.50%, Neem Extract 0.50%, Mango Leaf
Extract 0.50%, Camphor 0.01%, Alum 0.01%, Mango Flavour
Q.S. |
Figure 1: Zones of inhibition
produced by herbal dentifrice formulation A at 24 h against the three tested
microorganisms at four different dilutions. (A) Streptococcus mutans (B) Lactobacillus acidophilus (C) Candida albicans
(C) Control
Statistical analysis:
Results are expressed as Mean ± Standard Deviation for
illustration. Data are tested using a statistical package, namely, SPSS Windows
version 19. Statistical analysis is based on Kruskal–Wallis
test. A P-value, less than 0.05, is considered to be significant.
Results of this preliminary in vitro study demonstrate that dentifrice
formulation A is equally effective as formulations C and D, against Streptococcus mutans, (p<0.015, Table 2) whereas, against L.acidophilus
(p<0.014, Table 3) and C. albicans, (p<0.012, Table 4), dentifrice
formulation A displayed the maximum
zones of inhibition as compared to all other tested dentifrice formulations.
The mean values ± standard deviation of zones of inhibition are given for all
the test organisms. Each experiment was repeated three times (n = 3).
DISCUSSION:
A majority of oral diseases exhibit multifactorial
etiology 12. The interplay of host, agent and environmental factors
ultimately determine the oral health status of an individual. Dental caries and
diseases of the periodontium are among the most
prevalent chronic diseases worldwide. Poor oral hygiene is one of the key
reasons for their prevalence and harmful activities. Therefore; plaque control
is an important procedure involves the removal of microbial dental plaque biofilm and the prevention of its accumulation on the teeth
and adjacent gingival surfaces to prevent tooth decay and periodontal disease.
Most studies on antimicrobial activity of synthetic dentifrices have been
focused on their potential to inhibit oral microflora.
In particular, little information was found in recent literature research
concerning about herbal dentifrices and their therapeutic values for prevention
of dental caries, and other oral infections 13,14. A number of
toothpaste preparations containing herbal ingredients that may be beneficial by
improving oral health have been developed in recent years.
In our study, among all the investigated dentifrices, dentifrice formulation A emerged as the most effective, based on
the mean diameter of the zone of microbial inhibition produced by the dentifrices
in agar well diffusion method, against all the three microorganisms tested.
This might be due to the synergistic effect between the active ingredients of
the formulation (Table 1). All plant extracts used in this product are known to have positive
therapeutic effects, such as dried Ginger, the underground stem or rhizome of the plant Zingiber officinale has been used in Ayurvedic and Unani systems of
medicine in Indian and Arabic herbal traditions since ancient times, to treat a
wide array of ailments15. Ginger is one of the natural products
having antimicrobial property against various human pathogens, including oral
pathogens16. Black Pepper, has anti-inflammatory properties, which
are effective in treating swollen gums17. Long Pepper, an analgesic18. Harra, it is also one of the widely used plants in Ayurvedic
medicine. Few of the reported activities include antioxidant 19,
anti-caries 20, immunomodulatory21, anti-bacterial 22
and for wound healing23. Amla, is a
natural antioxidant with the richest source of vitamin C. It is antibacterial,
and it has astringent properties24. Liquorice, it is one of the most widely
used herbs from throughout history of Ayurveda. It has been studied for its biological actions,
including antioxidant, anti-genotoxic, anti-inflammatory,
anti-microbial, anti-plaque,
anti-caries25. Cloves are the aromatic dried flower buds contains an anesthetic chemical
compound called eugenol, which numbs nerves and
controls pain. It also possesses anti-inflammatory, antiseptic and astringent properties26. Next to the dentifrice formulation A, all other herbal dentifrices examined in
the study, are found to have antimicrobial activities and these are statistically significant but less effective when compared to dentifrice formulation A, and the samples
can be arranged in a descending order, of their effectiveness (Table 1).
It is known that a balance exists in each person’s oral microbial
population. If this balance is gone astray, opportunistic microorganisms can
multiply, enabling the initiation of disease processes. Therefore, the
dentifrice formulation identified as
having the maximum sensitivity to all three organisms at all concentrations and
thus probably the strongest antimicrobial properties, may not be certainly superior to the other
dentifrices. Because, the formulation used in vivo is likely to be
diluted by saliva, the level to which antimicrobial properties are buffered or
lost in dilution in vitro of interest 11.
Table 2: Antimicrobial
activity of herbal dentifrice formulations against Streptococcus mutans.
Dentifrice |
N |
Concentration tested |
Mean |
Standard Deviation |
Chi- Square |
P value |
A |
3 |
1:1 |
20.00 |
0.000 |
10.497 |
0.015** |
|
|
1:2 |
18.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
15.00 |
1.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
13.00 |
1.000 |
|
|
B |
3 |
1:1 |
18.33 |
0.577 |
10.532 |
0.015** |
|
|
1:2 |
14.67 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
12.33 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
10.33 |
0.577 |
|
|
C |
3 |
1:1 |
20.00 |
0.000 |
10.879 |
0.012** |
|
|
1:2 |
18.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
15.67 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
14.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
D |
3 |
1:1 |
20.00 |
0.000 |
10.761 |
0.013** |
|
|
1:2 |
18.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
14.67 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
11.67 |
0.577 |
|
|
E |
3 |
1:1 |
18.00 |
0.000 |
10.645 |
0.014** |
|
|
1:2 |
14.67 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
12.33 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
10.33 |
0.577 |
|
|
F |
3 |
1:1 |
15.00 |
0.000 |
10.298 |
0.016** |
|
|
1:2 |
12.33 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
10.33 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
09.00 |
1.000 |
|
|
n = 3, ***P < 0.01, **P <
0.05, *P < 0.10.
Table
3: Antimicrobial activity of herbal dentifrice formulations against Lactobacillus- acidophilus.
Dentifrice |
N |
Concentration tested |
Mean |
Standard Deviation |
Chi- Square |
P value |
A |
3 |
1:1 |
21.67 |
0.577 |
10.645 |
0.014** |
|
|
1:2 |
19.67 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
18.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
14.33 |
0.577 |
|
|
B |
3 |
1:1 |
20.00 |
0.000 |
10.879 |
0.012** |
|
|
1:2 |
18.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
14.33 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
12.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
C |
3 |
1:1 |
19.67 |
0.577 |
10.761 |
0.013** |
|
|
1:2 |
18.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
15.67 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
14.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
D |
3 |
1:1 |
19.67 |
0.577 |
10.761 |
0.013** |
|
|
1:2 |
18.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
14.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
11.33 |
0.577 |
|
|
E |
3 |
1:1 |
18.00 |
0.000 |
10.879 |
0.012** |
|
|
1:2 |
16.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
14.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
11.67 |
0.577 |
|
|
F |
3 |
1:1 |
18.00 |
0.000 |
10.761 |
0.013** |
|
|
1:2 |
16.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
13.33 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
11.67 |
0.577 |
|
|
n = 3, ***P < 0.01, **P <
0.05, *P < 0.10.
Table
4: Antimicrobial activity of herbal
dentifrice formulations against Candida albicans.
Dentifrice |
N |
Concentration tested |
Mean |
Standard Deviation |
Chi- Square |
P value |
A |
3 |
1:1 |
22.00 |
0.000 |
11.000 |
0.012** |
|
|
1:2 |
20.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
18.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
14.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
B |
3 |
1:1 |
20.33 |
0.577 |
10.645 |
0.014** |
|
|
1:2 |
18.33 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
14.33 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
12.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
C |
3 |
1:1 |
20.00 |
0.000 |
10.761 |
0.013** |
|
|
1:2 |
18.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
14.33 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
12.33 |
0.577 |
|
|
D |
3 |
1:1 |
20.00 |
0.000 |
10.761 |
0.013** |
|
|
1:2 |
18.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
14.67 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
12.67 |
0.577 |
|
|
E |
3 |
1:1 |
20.00 |
0.000 |
10.879 |
0.012** |
|
|
1:2 |
18.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
14.67 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
12.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
F |
3 |
1:1 |
20.00 |
0.000 |
10.879 |
0.012** |
|
|
1:2 |
18.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
|
|
1:4 |
14.33 |
0.577 |
|
|
|
|
1:8 |
12.00 |
0.000 |
|
|
n = 3, ***P < 0.01, **P < 0.05, *P < 0.10.
CONCLUSION:
This study shows significant differences in the ability of the
various herbal based dentifrices to inhibit the growth of certain plaque
microorganisms. Dentifrice formulation A emerged as the most effective toothpaste compared to all
other formulations tested.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
Sincere thanks Dr. N. Balakrishnan,
Department of Biostatistics, National Institute of Nutrition, for carrying out
the statistical analysis.
REFERENCE:
1. Anand TD et al. Effect of oil-pulling
on dental caries causing bacteria. Afr. J. Microbiol.
Res. 2(3); 2008: 063-066.
2. World
Health Organization: Oral Health Fact Sheet No. 318. 2007 [http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs318/en/print.html].
3. Khan AA, Jain SK
and Shrivastav A. Prevalence
of Dental Caries among the Population of Gwalior (India) in Relation of
Different Associated Factors. Eur J Dent. 2; 2008:
81–85.
4. WHO. Epidemiology, etiology and
prevention of periodontal diseases. Report of WHO Scientific Group, Technical
Report Series 621. Geneva 1978.
5. Hugar SM et al. An overview of
gingival and periodontal diseases in 12 to 15 years using gingivitis and periodontitis site prevalence index (WHO, 1978). World
journal of Dentitstry. 2(3); 2011: 175-181.
6. Amith HV, Ankola
AV and Nagesh L. Effect of Oil Pulling on Plaque and
Gingivitis. J Oral Health Comm Dent. 1(1); 2007:
12-18.
7. Fardal O and Turnbull RS. A review of
the literature on use of chlorhexidine in dentistry.
J Am Dent Assoc. 112(6); 1986: 863-9.
8. Agarwal T et al. In vitro study of
antibacterial activity of Carissa carandas leaf extracts. Asian J.Plant
Sci.Res. 2(1); 2012: 36-40.
9. Ozaki F et al. Efficacy of a
herbal toothpaste on patients with established gingivitis: A randomized
controlled trail. Braz. Oral Res. 20; 2006:172-177.
10. Cohan RP and Jacobsen PL. Herbal
supplements: Considerations in dental practice. J. California Den. Assoc. 28;
2000: 600-610.
11. Barry AL and Thornsberry
C. Susceptibility tests: Diffusion test procedures. Manual of clinical
microbiology, Edited by Balows A, Hausler
WJ Jr, Herrmann KL, Isenberg HD and Shadomy HJ. American Society for Microbiology, Washington
DC. 1991; 5th ed: pp. 1117-25.
12. Lenander-Lumikari M and Loimaranta
V. Saliva and dental caries. Adv Dent Res. 14; 2000: 40-47.
13. Singh J et al. Ethnomedicine: use in dental caries. Braz
J Oral Sci. 6 (21); 2007: 1308-1312.
14. Ellepola AN et al. A Comparison of the
Antifungal Activity of Herbal Toothpastes against Other Brands of Toothpastes
on Clinical Isolates of Candida albicans and Candida
dubliniensis. Med Princ
Pract. 20; 2011:112-117.
15. Malhotra S and Singh AP. Medicinal
properties of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). Natural Product Radiance. 2(6); 2003: 296-301.
16. Anjan G, Nagesh
L and Sapna B. Evaluation of antimicrobial potential
of 10% Ginger extract against Streptococcus
mutans, Candida albicans
and Enterococcus faecalis-An
in-vitro study. IJSID. 2(1); 2012: 260-265.
17. Meghwal M and Goswami
TK. Chemical Composition, Nutritional, Medicinal and Functional Properties of
Black Pepper: A Review. Scientific reports. 1(2); 2012:172.
18. Mamun AL et al. Evaluation of CNS
depressant and analgesic activities of the methanol extract of piper longum
Linn. Leaves. IJPSR. 2(11); 2011: 2874-2879.
19. Suchalatha S and Devi CS. Antioxidant
activity of ethanolic extract of Terminalia chebula fruit against isoproterenol –induced oxidative stress in rats. Indian
Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 42; 2005: 246-249.
20. Jagtap AG and Karkera
SG. Potential of the aqueous extract of Terminalia chebula as an anticaries
agent. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 68; 1999:
299–306.
21. Aher V and Wahi
AK. Immunomodulatory activity of alcohol extracts of Terminalia chebula Retz combretaceae. Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research.
10(5); 2011: 567-575.
22. Kannan P, Ramadevi
SR and Hopper W. Antibacterial activity of Terminalia chebula fruit extract. African Journal
of Microbiology Research. 3(4); 2009: 180-184.
23. Choudhary GP. Wound healing activity of ethanolic extract of Terminalia chebula retzius.
International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences.
2(1); 2011: 48-52.
24. Srivasuki KP. Nutritional and health care
benefits of Amla. Journal of Pharmacognosy. 3(2);
2012:141-151.
25. Jatav J et al. Recent Pharmacological
Trends of Glycyrrhiza glabra Linn.
IJPFR. 1(1); 2011:170-185.
26. Kumar P et al. Medicinal,
therapeutic and pharmacological effects of Syzygium aromaticum (laung).
Pharmacologyonline. 1; 2011: 1044-1055.
Received
on 23.05.2013 Modified
on 08.06.2013
Accepted
on 12.06.2013 ©A&V Publications All right reserved
Res. J. Pharmacology & P’dynamics.
6(1): Jan.-Mar. 2014; Page 30-35